Your complete guide to grant writing, proposal development, donor mapping, budgeting, and impact reporting to fund your chapter's mission.
Designed PDF edition coming soon to the publications library
Grants are a cornerstone of SSDP chapter funding. This section guides you through every stage of the grant writing process.
| Funding Type | Description | Typical Value | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Student Government / SRC Grants | Campus-based funding for registered student organisations | USD 200 to 2,000 | Events, materials, travel |
| University Faculty / Department Grants | Academic department support for student research or education | USD 300 to 5,000 | Research projects, workshops |
| SSDP International Chapter Fund | Seed grants for new chapters and project support | USD 500 to 3,000 | New chapters, flagship campaigns |
| Community Foundation Grants | Local foundations supporting civil society and youth | USD 1,000 to 20,000 | Programme delivery, capacity building |
| Drug Policy Reform Funders | Foundations specifically funding drug policy work | USD 5,000 to 100,000+ | Advocacy, research, coalitions |
| Public Health Funders | Health foundations and government health departments | USD 2,000 to 50,000 | Harm reduction education, peer health |
| Individual Donors / Crowdfunding | Small donations from supporters via online platforms | USD 50 to 5,000 | Specific campaigns, events |
Not every grant is right for your chapter. Before writing, assess fit: does the funder's priorities align with SSDP's mission (drug policy, harm reduction, youth empowerment)? Is your chapter eligible (geography, organisation type, size)? Is the grant amount proportionate to your capacity to deliver? Are the reporting requirements manageable with your current team?
Before writing a single word, gather: the funder's current strategic priorities and funded project examples, application guidelines, eligibility criteria and restrictions, deadlines and submission format requirements, any relationship or connection you have with the funder, and information on previous grantees.
A fundable project has five elements: Problem (what specific problem does your project address, with evidence of need); Solution (what will you do and why is your approach effective); Target group (who benefits, how many, in what geography); Outcomes (what will change and how will you measure it); Sustainability (how the work continues after the grant ends).
Follow your funder's template. In the absence of a template, use the structure in Section 2. Strong proposals are clear and concise (no jargon), evidence-based, specific (named activities, timelines, beneficiary numbers, indicators), realistic (credible budget and timeline), and aligned to the funder's stated priorities.
Your budget must be accurate (based on real quotes and costs, not guesses), justified (every line item explained in a narrative), compliant (only includes items allowed by the funder), and should show co-funding if you have other income or in-kind contributions, as it demonstrates credibility.
Have at least one person not involved in writing review the proposal for clarity; check every requirement in the guidelines, since missing items lead to instant disqualification; submit at least 48 hours before the deadline to allow for technical issues; keep a copy of everything you submit; send a brief acknowledgement email to the funder after submission.
| Mistake | Why It Fails | How to Avoid |
|---|---|---|
| Vague outcomes ("raise awareness") | Funders cannot measure impact | Use specific, measurable outcome statements with numbers |
| Budget not matching narrative | Creates doubt about accuracy | Cross-check budget and narrative line by line |
| Ignoring funder guidelines | Disqualification on submission | Read guidelines three times; use a checklist |
| Overly ambitious for capacity | Destroys credibility | Scope project to what your team can actually deliver |
| No sustainability plan | Funders dislike one-off projects | Explain how the work continues beyond the grant |
| Missing evidence of need | The problem seems abstract | Use local data, statistics, and case examples |
Adaptable proposal structures for two common grant types. Replace all bracketed sections with your chapter's specific information: these are starting points, not final documents.
A well-maintained donor map is a strategic tool that guides your fundraising decisions and tracks relationship progress.
Brainstorm and research all potential funders relevant to your geography and work area. Include foundations, trusts, government bodies, university funds, individual donors, and crowdfunding options.
For each potential funder, gather: funding priorities, eligibility criteria, grant size range, application deadlines, and contact information.
Rate each funder on alignment with your mission, likelihood of success, and effort required to apply.
Develop a relationship before submitting a proposal wherever possible. Attend funder events, send introductory emails, and seek informal conversations.
Record every interaction, application, and outcome in your donor map. Update it at least quarterly.
| Funder Name | Type | Focus Areas | Grant Range (USD) | Deadline(s) | Eligibility | Contact | Alignment Score (1 to 5) | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SSDP International Chapter Fund | Intl NGO | Drug policy, youth advocacy | 500 to 3,000 | Rolling | Affiliated chapters | chapters@ssdp.org | 5 | Apply Year 1 | Priority funder |
| [University SRC / Student Union] | Campus | Student organisations | 200 to 2,000 | [Term deadline] | Registered student orgs | [SRC email] | 4 | To apply | |
| [Local Community Foundation] | Foundation | Youth, health, civic society | 2,000 to 15,000 | [Date] | Registered NPO | [Contact] | 3 | Research needed | |
| [National Drug Policy NGO] | NGO | Drug policy reform | 1,000 to 10,000 | [Date] | Youth orgs | [Contact] | 4 | Intro meeting planned | |
| [Drug Policy Alliance / Open Society] | Intl Foundation | Drug policy, human rights | 5,000 to 50,000 | Varies | Registered organisations | [Contact] | 5 | Year 2 target | Requires track record |
| [Public Health Foundation] | Foundation | Harm reduction, public health | 2,000 to 20,000 | [Date] | Health-focused orgs | [Contact] | 3 | Research needed | |
| Crowdfunding (GoFundMe / Backabuddy) | Crowdfund | Any | Variable | Ongoing | All | Online platform | 3 | Campaign events |
| Region | Relevant Funder Types | Examples (Adapt to Local Context) |
|---|---|---|
| Africa | Community foundations, Pan-African health funders, local trusts, UNODC civil society fund | Open Society Foundation Africa, Robert Carr Fund, National Lottery (SA), Trust Africa |
| Asia | Asian foundations, national health ministries, regional civil society funds | Levi Strauss Foundation, Asian Community Trust, national AIDS/health commissions |
| Oceania | National foundations, Pacific health funders, student unions | Ian Potter Foundation, Myer Foundation, local council grants, university research funds |
| Europe | European Commission funds, national youth agencies, health foundations | European Youth Foundation, European Drug Policy Initiative, national public health agencies |
A well-structured budget is as important as the proposal narrative. Funders scrutinise budgets carefully.
Replace all [ITEMS] with actual costs based on real quotes. All amounts in USD or your local currency (state clearly). The project budget template is organised into five categories.
| Category | Line Items |
|---|---|
| A. Personnel | Project Coordinator (volunteer stipend): part-time coordination, 10 hrs/week x 8 weeks (Grant); Facilitators / Speakers: honoraria for workshop facilitators (Grant); Subtotal A |
| B. Event and Programme Costs | Venue hire: meeting room for workshops x 3 sessions (Grant); Catering / refreshments (Grant); Printing and materials: resource guides, handouts, posters (Grant); Audio-visual equipment hire (Grant); Subtotal B |
| C. Communications and Media | Social media advertising: boosted posts for event promotion (Grant); Graphic design: posters, social media assets (In-kind); Subtotal C |
| D. Monitoring and Evaluation | Survey printing / online tools: pre/post surveys for knowledge assessment (Grant); Reporting costs: final report design and printing (Grant); Subtotal D |
| E. Contingency | Contingency (max 5 to 10%): unforeseen expenses with funder approval (Grant); Total Project Budget = sum of all subtotals |
Regular, accurate reporting is both a legal obligation to funders and a demonstration of your chapter's professionalism and accountability.